
The BBC aired a profile of Facebook tonight (if you are UK-based, you can watch it here): a well put together piece of journalism which benefitted from some decent access (there are advantages to being the BBC after all!).
Blogs, tweets and online commentators immediately jumped on the issue of privacy; especially with regards the placement of ads for products and pages that end-users have ‘liked.’
However, The Next Web (in Zee’s blog post) claimed that the ‘big(gest) question’ put to Facebook’s co-creator, Mark Zuckerberg, related to the ‘threat of Google+;’ a newly released social network from the Masters of Search.
Predictably, Zuckerberg’s answer revealed little – but what was more revealing were his numerous thoughts on the ‘open source nature’ of social media networks; both in respect of shared information provided by end-users and in relation to app add-ons (decribed in the film in the context of Facebook gaming apps). Open is best. Open and shared is better. Apparently.
One man seemed to disagree: Sir Martin Sorrell – and as CEO of the worlds largest adverting Group, his contrary view is worth considering.
More on this from us later – but for the time being, ponder this: the big question regarding the future of the social media will not be about the tensions between Facebook and Google (or anyone else for that matter) but between the end-user (as content creators, largely) and tech companies who publish and utilise the inherent value of this media (and the data it generates).
Sorrrell’s point needs further exploration, and poses a bigger question altogether: has the ‘open’ and the ‘sharing’ model had it’s day?